| 
             
            Few would know it by its official designation, the Navy Type 1 
            Attack Bomber. The Allies called it the BETTY but to the men that 
            flew the airplane, it was popularly, but unofficially, the 'Hamaki,' 
            Japanese for cigar, in honour of the airplane's rotund, cigar-shaped 
            fuselage. The Japanese built more of them than any other bomber 
            during World War II. From the first day of war until after the 
            surrender, BETTY bombers saw service throughout the Pacific and 
            Indian Oceans. Like its stable mate, Mitsubishi's Zero Fighter the 
            Hamaki soldiered on long after it became obsolete, even dangerous, 
            to fly wherever Allied interceptors prowled.  
            
              
            
            In July 1937, the new Mitsubishi G3M bomber (Allied codename NELL) 
            went into service in China. Only two months later, the Navy issued a 
            specification to Mitsubishi for a NELL replacement. At that time, 
            the requirements were unprecedented for a twin-engine, land-based 
            attack bomber: flying at a top speed of 398 kph (247 mph) and an 
            altitude of 3,000 m (9,845 ft), the new bomber had to fly a distance 
            of 4,722 km (2,933 miles) without a torpedo or equivalent weight in 
            bombs. When carrying an 800 kg (1,768 lb) torpedo or the same weight 
            in bombs, the Navy needed the bomber to fly at least 3,700 km (2,300 
            mi). 
            
            To meet the requirements, a Mitsubishi design team led by Kiro Honjo 
            crafted an airplane called the G4M with fuel tanks in the wings that 
            were not resistant to explosion when punctured during combat. These 
            tanks were much lighter in weight than explosion-proof (also called 
            'self-sealing') gas tanks. The decision not to incorporate the 
            heavier, safer fuel tanks was necessary to meet the Navy's range 
            requirements. Mitsubishi incorporated this same design feature in 
            the Zero, for the same reasons and with the same results. Both 
            aircraft had unprecedented range but they were also extremely 
            vulnerable to the machine gun and cannon fire from Allied fighter 
            aircraft. The BETTY was so prone to ignite that the Allies nicknamed 
            it the 'flying lighter.' 
            
            The fuselage was streamlined but rotund to allow space for a bomb 
            bay within the wing centre section and to allow the 7 to 9-man crew 
            to move about. About half the crew were gunners who manned the 
            defensive armament positions. Bomber crews flying the NELL were 
            virtually incapable of defending themselves from concentrated 
            fighter attacks, so Honjo paid special attention to this aspect of 
            the G4M. He incorporated 7.7 mm (.30 cal.) guns in the nose, atop 
            the mid-fuselage behind the cockpit, and on both sides of the 
            fuselage behind the wing. In the tail, he introduced a 20 mm cannon. 
            Although the G4M now had a more potent sting, Honjo again sacrificed 
            crew protection to the Navy's demands for great range. He omitted 
            armour plate. 
            
            The first G4M prototype left the factory in September 1939 and made 
            the trek to Kagamigahara Airfield for Mitsubishi's Nagoya plant had 
            no company airstrip. Kagamigahara was 48 km (30 miles) to the north. 
            Japan's newest and most advanced bomber made the trip, disassembled 
            and stacked on five ox-drawn farm carts, over unpaved roads! After 
            arriving at the airfield, the first G4M was reassembled and flown by 
            test pilot Katsuzo Shima on October 23, 1939. Initial results were 
            impressive, but the Navy shelved the bomber for a time in favour of 
            a variant to be called the G6M1. Navy leaders hoped that by 
            increasing the number of defensive cannons, the G6M1 could become a 
            heavy escort fighter for other bombers but this diversion failed to 
            live up to expectations, and the Navy ordered the G4M1 into 
            production. The U. S. Army Air Corps conducted a similar experiment 
            using a modified Boeing B-17 bomber designated the B-40 but this 
            idea too failed to survive operational testing and was soon 
            abandoned. The first production G4M rolled off the line in April 
            1941. For the remainder of the war, the BETTY assembly line 
            continued to run. 
            
            Operationally, BETTY crews achieved much in their first year of 
            combat. They devastated Clark Field, Philippine Islands, on December 
            8, 1941, and participated in sinking the British battleships HMS 
            "Prince of Wales" and HMS "Repulse" on December 10. They ranged 
            across the length and breadth of the Pacific theatre, attacking 
            targets from the Aleutians to Australia. Against limited fighter 
            opposition, the lack of armour and self-sealing fuel tanks was no 
            hindrance. The savings in airframe weight allowed the G4M to attack 
            targets at unprecedented ranges. But as Allied fighter strength 
            increased, the BETTY began to reveal its fatal vulnerabilities. 
            Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, architect of the Pearl Harbour attack, 
            died on April 18, 1943, along with his entire staff when U. S. Army 
            Air Corps P-38 Lightnings intercepted and destroyed the two BETTY 
            bombers that carried them. Six escorting Zeros flew guard but in a 
            matter of seconds, the Air Corps pilots shrugged off the escorting 
            fighters and sent both BETTYs crashing down in flames. 
            
            As the war dragged, improved bombers failed to materialize so 
            Mitsubishi fielded different versions of the G4M to fulfil new 
            missions, and to eliminate the various weaknesses in the basic 
            design. Front-line combat units operated many variants and 
            sub-variants with different engines and armament packages. The G4M2 
            was a complete redesign but it did not overcome the airplane's 
            vulnerability to Allied firepower. Mitsubishi tried again to reduce 
            the bomber's tendency to burn. The firm changed the wing to a 
            single-spar configuration and installed self-sealing fuel tanks with 
            a capacity about one-third less than earlier versions. The capacity 
            dropped because of the material inserted in the tank to block 
            leaking fuel when gunfire perforated the tank. Armour plate was also 
            added to all crew positions and the tail turret was redesigned. As a 
            result of these modifications, the fuselage was shortened and the 
            centre-of-gravity shifted forward. To re-balance the bomber, 
            dihedral was added to the horizontal stabilizer. This version was 
            called the G4M Model 34.  
   |